Politicians under Radical Uncertainty: How Uncertain Phenomena Influence Political Elites' Behavior
RADIUNCE aims to develop a multidisciplinary model analyzing how political elites in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US respond to radically uncertain phenomena from 1996-2021.
Projectdetails
Introduction
Political elites—political representatives who can take binding decisions, e.g. ministers, parliamentarians, local politicians—face numerous radically uncertain phenomena, from Covid-19 to the long-term effects of Brexit. Radical uncertainty is characterized by manifold unknowns, ambiguity, and vagueness. It differs fundamentally from resolvable uncertainty, which refers to situations in which it is possible to assign probabilities to outcomes, like the electoral consequences of welfare retrenchment.
Research Focus
RADIUNCE will explore how these phenomena influence political elites' behavior. Key questions include:
- Do they "avoid" uncertainty, as some did with the coronavirus?
- Do they use rules of thumb, "heuristics," e.g. comparing Covid-19 to the flu?
- Do they display other behavioral responses?
Answering these questions is urgent, as different responses have different outcomes that may impact how representative democracies function and how effective they are at solving problems. For example, avoiding a virus may cost lives, while using heuristics may result in faulty courses of action.
Project Aim
RADIUNCE's aim is to develop a theoretical model of how political elites respond to both radically and resolvably uncertain phenomena. We will focus on four countries with different institutional opportunities and constraints for responding to uncertainty:
- Germany
- The Netherlands
- The United Kingdom
- The United States
The time frame for this study will be from 1996 to 2021.
Methodology
The model will be multidisciplinary, integrating insights from:
- Political science
- Behavioral economics
- Decision theory
- Psychology
- Public administration
We will collect new, unique comparative data from politicians through an innovative combination of automated text analysis and survey experiments.
Approach
Taking a multimethods approach, we will integrate quantitative data with qualitative methods, including:
- Process tracing
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis
- Interviews
The new model will explain how political elites respond to the challenges and opportunities in our fast-paced world, from digitalization to Covid-19 to migration.
Financiële details & Tijdlijn
Financiële details
Subsidiebedrag | € 1.995.424 |
Totale projectbegroting | € 1.995.424 |
Tijdlijn
Startdatum | 1-2-2023 |
Einddatum | 31-1-2028 |
Subsidiejaar | 2023 |
Partners & Locaties
Projectpartners
- UNIVERSITEIT UTRECHTpenvoerder
Land(en)
Vergelijkbare projecten binnen European Research Council
Project | Regeling | Bedrag | Jaar | Actie |
---|---|---|---|---|
New trends or old habits? Stability and changes of political styles since 1960The POLSTYLE project analyzes the evolution of political styles in four European democracies since 1960, examining how institutional factors shape these styles amid changing political contexts. | ERC Starting... | € 1.496.219 | 2023 | Details |
Healthy or harmful distrust? On the democratic relevance of political scepticism over blind (dis)trustCRITICALTRUST develops a novel model to differentiate between blind and evaluative political (dis)trust, using cross-national surveys to enhance understanding and improve democratic engagement. | ERC Consolid... | € 1.999.995 | 2023 | Details |
Reconciling Citizens with the Tradeoffs of Democracy: Attitudes Toward Democracy Under Rising PoliticizationThis project investigates citizens' and parties' preferences on democratic tradeoffs in 15 European countries to understand their impact on support for democracy and develop new measurement tools. | ERC Starting... | € 1.499.967 | 2022 | Details |
Residential mobility and the realignment of electoral politics in established democraciesRESPOL aims to explore how residential mobility influences political attitudes and electoral realignment in democracies, integrating insights from psychology and social capital theory. | ERC Starting... | € 1.442.383 | 2025 | Details |
Systemic Effects of Crises on Policy-Making in Modern DemocraciesCRISPOL studies the systemic impact of crises on democratic policy-making by mapping crisis events and analyzing trade-offs in policy change across sectors and countries over 50 years. | ERC Advanced... | € 2.495.337 | 2024 | Details |
New trends or old habits? Stability and changes of political styles since 1960
The POLSTYLE project analyzes the evolution of political styles in four European democracies since 1960, examining how institutional factors shape these styles amid changing political contexts.
Healthy or harmful distrust? On the democratic relevance of political scepticism over blind (dis)trust
CRITICALTRUST develops a novel model to differentiate between blind and evaluative political (dis)trust, using cross-national surveys to enhance understanding and improve democratic engagement.
Reconciling Citizens with the Tradeoffs of Democracy: Attitudes Toward Democracy Under Rising Politicization
This project investigates citizens' and parties' preferences on democratic tradeoffs in 15 European countries to understand their impact on support for democracy and develop new measurement tools.
Residential mobility and the realignment of electoral politics in established democracies
RESPOL aims to explore how residential mobility influences political attitudes and electoral realignment in democracies, integrating insights from psychology and social capital theory.
Systemic Effects of Crises on Policy-Making in Modern Democracies
CRISPOL studies the systemic impact of crises on democratic policy-making by mapping crisis events and analyzing trade-offs in policy change across sectors and countries over 50 years.